JERRY LYNN YOUNG, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NEAL B. BIGGERS, JR., ET AL., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied petitions for rehearing and suggested that the trial court may dismiss certain defendants on limitations or immunity grounds upon remand.
The case was remanded to the trial court for further consideration in light of a new Supreme Court decision. The appellate court noted that the trial …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rehearing En Banc cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Treating the suggestions for rehearing en banc as petitions for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petitions for panel rehearing are DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestions for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED.
We note in passing that in remanding this cause to the trial court we do not foreclose its possible dismissal as to “private citizen” defendants on limitations grounds, nor, for that matter, as to public officials on grounds of immunity. It well may be that, in the instance of the private citizen defendants, the retroactive application of Gates v. Spinks, 771 F. 2d 916 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied - U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1378, 89 L.Ed.2d 603 (1986) is not forbidden by the Supreme Court’s AlKhazraji decision,1 there having never been any question that the longer, six-year statute applicable to law-enforcement officials applied to the private defendants. We simply conclude that Al-Khazraji forecloses the across-the-board dismissal of the defendants decreed by the trial court; and we remand to that court for further consideration of the case in the light of our opinions and of Al-Khazraji, handed down long after the court’s decision.
. St. Francis College v. Majid Ghaidan AlKhazraji, - U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2022, 95 L.Ed.2d 582 (1987).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Saint Francis Coll. v. Al-Khazraji, 481 U.S. 604 (U.S. 1987)
- United States v. Moore et ux., 340 U.S. 616 (U.S. 1951)
- Mrs. Peggy Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir. 1985)
- Young v. Biggers, 820 F.2d 727 (5th Cir. 1987)