STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JEFFERY SALSBERRY, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1986-04-28
No. 84-1403
UPCHURCH, J., concurs., GOSHORN, G.S., Jr., Associate Judge, dissents with opinion.
487 So. 2d 402 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court correctly scored the 1981 burglaries as primary offenses at conviction, not prior offenses.


Facts & Procedural History

Defendant was sentenced for 1981 burglaries and 1984 offenses. The trial court scored the 1981 offenses as primary and 1984 offenses as additional. Th…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
COBB, Chief Judge.

COBB, Chief Judge.

The defendant was sentenced on September 11, 1984, for three counts of burglary (second-degree felonies) committed in 1981, for which adjudication had been withheld at that time, and for various third-degree felonies and misdemeanors committed in 1984. The trial court scored the 1981 burglaries as the primary offenses at conviction, and the 1984 crimes as additional offenses at conviction. The state contends the 1981 offenses should be scored as prior offenses.

We agree with the trial court. Hallback v. State, 479 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Bradley v. State, 480 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The approval by the supreme court of the commission’s proposed clarification of the committee notes to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(5)1 has not been implemented by legislative action as required by § 921.001(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1985).

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, J., concurs.

GOSHORN, G.S., Jr., Associate Judge, dissents with opinion.

. See The Florida Bar Re: Rules of Criminal Procedure, 482 So. 2d 311 (Fla.1986).

Dissent
GOSHORN, G.S., Jr., Associate Judge,

GOSHORN, G.S., Jr., Associate Judge,

dissenting:

The stated purpose of the guidelines is to establish a uniform set of standards to eliminate unwarranted variation in the sentencing process. Clearly, if Salsberry’s probation had been completed or the probation officer had elected not to file a violation, the 1981 offenses would have been properly scored as prior record. A different result should not obtain simply because probation violations are before the court at the time the defendant is being sentenced for new crimes.

The 1981 crimes should have been scored as prior record and the 1984 crimes of burglary of a structure should have been scored as the primary offense at conviction. This is consistent with the clarification of the committee note to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(5) approved by the supreme court, The Florida Bar Re: Rules of Criminal Procedure, 482 So. 2d 311 (Fla.1986):

For any offense where sentence was previously suspended pursuant to the imposition of probation and such offense is now before the court for sentencing, upon a revocation of that probation based on a subsequent criminal offense (which subsequent offense is also before the court for sentencing at the same time), the earlier offense shall be scored as “prior record” and not as “additional offense.”

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rojas v. State, 506 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
    …return to crime following his robbery conviction as justification, the trial judge departed from the sentencing guidelines and sentenced Rojas to two five-year terms and one sixty-day term, to run concurrently. Rojas relies upon State v. Salsberry, 487 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Bradley v. State, 480 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); cause dismissed, 486 So. 2d 595 (Fla.1986); and Hallback v. State, 479 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), to support his contention that, because he had been placed under communi…
  • Linwood A. Findley v. State, 521 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. State v. Salsberry, 487 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER and DANIEL, JJ., concur.…
  • Jolly v. State, 502 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
    …on as a prior record conviction. The violation of probation should have been scored as the primary offense because it was an offense pending before the court at the time of the sentencing. Rule 3.701(d)(4), Fla.R.Crim.P. See also State v. Salsberry, 487 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Bradley v. State, 480 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), cause dismissed, 486 So. 2d 595 (Fla.1986) and Hallback v. State, 479 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED FOR RESEN-TENCING. DE…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw