D.A.P., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Cruller v. State, 808 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2002)
  …Horne v. State, 623 So. 2d 777, 777 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (reversing one of two convictions for armed robbery because “[tjhere was little or no temporal or geographic break between the two takings” of property from one individual); Hamilton v. State, 487 So. 2d 407, 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (reversing defendant’s conviction for grand theft, where the defendant also had been convicted of robbery for holding the victim up at gunpoint and stealing the victim’s cash and automobile— all in a single transaction); McCl…
• Nordelo v. State, 603 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …al logic dictates that there were two separate acts of taking, practical logic dictates that the takings were part of one comprehensive transaction to confiscate the sole victim’s property. Case law buttresses practical logic. In Hamilton v. State, 487 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), the defendant held up the victim at gunpoint taking the victim’s cash and the victim’s automobile. He was convicted of two separate counts. This court reversed the separate convictions finding that the two takings occurred in a s…
• Howard v. State, 723 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …(Fla.1994), wherein the court concluded that grand theft auto and armed robbery based upon the theft of a single car were not two offenses, but instead were “merely degree variants of the core offense of theft.” Howard also cites Hamilton v. State, 487 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), wherein the court held that dual convictions for grand theft and robbery constituted double jeopardy, once the evidence showed that Hamilton held up the victim with a gun and stole his cash and his car. The court stated, however,…

Authorities Cited

• Brewer v. State, 413 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)