JAMES MAYNARD, APPELLANT,

v.

RICHARD SAYLES; OREN J. MCCART; RONALD L. CALEGARI; JOHN M. BARTLETT; STEVEN CHRISTENSEN; MARK W. WALKER; BARRY L. HARRIS; PETER A. EDLUND, APPELLEES

8th Cir. | 1987-10-14

No. 86-1784

Before LAY, Chief Judge, HEANEY, McMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG, BOWMAN, WOLLMAN and MAGILL, Circuit Judges, and BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.

831 F.2d 173 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1987)

Opinion of the Court

The panel opinion filed April 23, 1987 is vacated. The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an evenly divided court, five judges voting to affirm and five judges voting to reverse. Judge Bright dissents for the reasons expressed in the panel opinion, Maynard v. Sayles, 817 F. 2d 50 (8th Cir.1987), joined by Chief Judge Lay and Judges Heaney, McMillian and Arnold.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Maynard v. Sayles, 817 F.2d 50 (8th Cir. 1987)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

JAMES MAYNARD, APPELLANT, v. RICHARD SAYLES; OREN J. MCCART; RONALD L. CALEGARI; JOHN M. BARTLETT; STEVEN CHRISTENSEN; MARK W. WALKER; BARRY L. HARRIS; PETER A. EDLUND, APPELLEES

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

JAMES MAYNARD, APPELLANT,

v.

RICHARD SAYLES; OREN J. MCCART; RONALD L. CALEGARI; JOHN M. BARTLETT; STEVEN CHRISTENSEN; MARK W. WALKER; BARRY L. HARRIS; PETER A. EDLUND, APPELLEES