EFRAIN SOLIVAN, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. MAY, 703 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …are not in dispute. May was given an injection of Demerol at her doctor’s office to relieve the nausea caused by her migraine headaches. Demerol is a controlled substance under chapter 893, Florida Statutes (1991). Thompson v. Dep’t of Prof l Reg., 488 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). May subsequently left the doctor’s office and drove her car to the pharmacy to get a prescription filled. May concedes in her posttrial motions that she was under the influence of Demerol almost immediately after being injected,…
• Santacroce v. State, 608 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
  …titutional guarantee of right to counsel is not applicable to administrative proceedings involving the revocation of licenses issued by the state to those engaged in regulated businesses and professions. Thompson v. Dept. of Professional Regulation, 488 So. 2d 103, 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Appellant also reasserts his contention that he should not have been found guilty of having violated section 517.12 because he was justified in relying upon Allied’s representation that his registration was effective as of…
• Miller v. Castor, 615 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
  …this issue for the first time on appeal. Regardless, the appellant did not raise a material dispute at the hearing which would have justified terminating the informal hearing. Thompson v. Dep’t. of Professional Regulation, Bd. of Medical Examiners, 488 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Cohen v. Dep’t. of Professional Regulation, Bd. of Optometry, 407 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Finally, the appellant was fully informed of her rights and the implications of choosing an informal hearing. Thus, this allegation…

Authorities Cited

• Glassalum Eng'g Corp. v. 392208 Ontario Ltd., 487 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
• Kilpatrick v. State, 356 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)