HOTEL HALCEYON CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
THE GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, AS LIQUIDATOR OF BISCAYNE TRUST COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE, AND OSSINING TRUST COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE, APPELLEES
HOTEL HALCEYON CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
THE GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, AS LIQUIDATOR OF BISCAYNE TRUST COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE, AND OSSINING TRUST COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE, APPELLEES
104 Fla. 121
Florida Supreme Court (1932)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 139 So. 200
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
—This cause was heard on the same record, and virtually the same questions are raised as were raised in The Eureka Corporation, a Georgia Corporation vs. The Guardian Trust Co. et al., decided this date. The judgment below in this cause is therefore affirmed on authority of the last named case.
Affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bruno v. State, 807 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2001)…on to the other subclaims. . See, e.g., Tyson v. Aikman, 159 Fla. 273, 31 So. 2d 272, 273 (1947) ("An appeal is to consider errors alleged to have been committed by the ... trial judge.”); M.F.S. Land Co. v. J. Ray Arnold Cypress Co., 103 Fla. 732, 139 So. 200, 201 (1931) (“[T]he purpose of an appeal is to correct a harmful error which the [trial court] may have committed.”). . See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). . See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c) ("This rule d…
-
McEwen v. Schenck, 108 Fla. 119 (Fla. 1933)…cknowledgment is of no validity or effect to show that the deed or mortgage of homestead real estate was ‘duly executed’ as is mandatorily required by the constitution.” Hutchinson v. Stone, 79 Fla. 157, text 169, 84 So. 151. In Morris v. Shepard, 104 Fla. 121, 139 So. 189, it was held that the evidence was not sufficient to overcome the certificate of the notary public that the married woman personally appeared before the notary and made the requisite acknowledgment that she executed the mortgage. The ce…
-
N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Oates, 122 Fla. 540 (Fla. 1935)…owledge the execution of the mortgage, then, in the absence of estoppel, such averment as a defense may be proven by convincing evidence. Hutchinson v. Stone, 79 Fla. 157, 84 So. 151; Randall v. Twitchell, 98 Fla. 559, 124 So. 21; Morris v. Shepard, 104 Fla. 121, 139 So. 189; Smith v. Hogan, 117 Fla. 82, 157 So. 183; Suttle v. Wold, 117 Fla. 802, 157 So. 447; Smith v. McEwen, decided at this term. Where it is admitted or duly proven that the wife did appear before the officer concerning the execution of th…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence