ROBERT C. STEBBINS, APPELLANT,
v.
RITA STEBBINS, APPELLEE
ROBERT C. STEBBINS, APPELLANT,
RITA STEBBINS, APPELLEE
488 So. 2d 133
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Bennett v. Halper, 248 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 252 So. 2d 799 (Fla.1971).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Standard Jury Instructions-Contract & Bus. Cases, 116 So. 3d 284 (Fla. 2013)…s, and the parties’ agreement when they entered into the contract. Sound City, Inc. v. Kessler, 316 So. 2d 315, 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Cocoa Props., Inc. v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., 590 So. 2d 989, 991 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Sharp v. Machry, 488 So. 2d 133, 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). 416.20 INTERPRETATION-CONSTRUCTION AGAINST DRAFTER You must first attempt to determine the meaning of the ambiguous term(s) in the contract from the evidence presented and the previous instructions. If you cannot do so, on…
-
Lamitu Corp. v. Stottler Stagg & Assocs., Inc., 505 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…tled to be paid for services rendered pursuant to the contract. See Peacock Constr. Co. v. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc., 353 So. 2d 840, 842 (Fla.1977); Poinsettia Dairy Prods., Inc. v. Wessel Co., 123 Fla. 120, 166 So. 306 (1936); Sharp v. Machry, 488 So. 2d 133, 135-37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Babe, Inc. v. Baby’s Formula Serv., Inc., 165 So. 2d 795, 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). The final judgment under review is, therefore, in all respects Affirmed.…
-
Travelbiz Solutions, Inc. v. Click Interconnect, Inc., 947 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…that the “$37,500 payment made by Tra-velbiz Solutions, Inc. to Click Interconnect, Inc. was a loan.” Having made that decision, I believe the trial court erred when it failed to impose a reasonable time for payment of the loan. See Sharp v. Machry, 488 So. 2d 133, 135 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (“[WJhere a debt is due and the happening of a future event is fixed on merely as a convenient time for payment, but the future event does not happen as contemplated, the law implies a promise to pay within a reasonable time.…
Authorities Cited
- Belcher v. Lines, 252 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 1971)
- Bennett v. Halper, 252 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 1971)
- Schoenberg v. State, 248 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
- Bennett v. Halper, 248 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)