PETER SMITH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1900-01-01
42 Fla. 236 Florida Supreme Court (1900) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Peter Smith was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to death. The Florida Supreme Court reversed the conviction and granted a new trial because the State failed to prove that the fatal wound was inflicted in Leon County as alleged in the indictment, despite proving the victim died there.


Holding

The court properly permitted filing a second indictment while the first remained pending. However, the court erred in refusing a new trial because the State failed to prove the mortal wound was inflicted in Leon County as required by the indictment, even though it proved death occurred there.


Key Quotes

“the court did err in refusing the motion for a new trial, because the State failed to prove that the mortal wound was inflicted in Leon county -as alleged in the indictment”

Establishes the core holding that proof of the location where the fatal wound was inflicted is required when alleged in the indictment.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Smith was indicted for murder in the first degree in Leon County. He was tried and convicted on a second indictment filed while a prior indictment for…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Carter, J.:

Carter, J.:

On December 4th, 1899, during a term of the Circuit Court of Leon county, an indictment charging plaintiff in error with murder in the first degree was presented by the grand jury. On December 8th] another indictment for the same offence was presented, and subsequently on the same day a nolle prosequi was entered as to the former one. Plaintiff in error was arraigned and tried on the second indictment, found guilty of murder in the first degree, and from the death sentence passed December 9th, sued out this writ of error. The indictment alleges that the'mortal stroke was given in Leon county, and that deceased died in that county. By the assignment of errors it is claimed, among other things, that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial, and in permitting the second indictment to be filed before the first had been disposed of.

The co-urt did not err in permitting a second indictment to be presented and filed, while a former one for the same offence was still pending. Eldridge v. State, 27 Fla. 162, 9 South. Rep. 448; State v. Curtis, 29 Kan. 384; Bailey v. State, 11 Tex. App. 140. But the court did err in refusing the motion for a new trial, because the State failed to prove that the mortal, wound was inflicted in Leon county -as alleged in the indictment. While it is unnecessary to allege the place of the death of the party slain under our statutes (Roberson v. State, decided at this term), where the indictment is found in the county where the mortal stroke was inflicted, it is necessary to allege and prove the place of the stroke, even though the prosecution be commenced in the county of death, for the stroke in such cases must be laid with particulars of time and place in order to enable the accused to prepare his defence. One of the State’s witnesses testified that the deceased just prior to her death was brought up to Tallahassee from a turpentine camp, and that she died in Tallahassee, Leon county, Florida. The mortal wound was inflicted on Friday morning, September 8th, and death ensued about twelve o’clock that night. Other witnesses locate the place of the stroke as-being very near “Clarrissa’s house,” and the latter as being in sight of Alice Jones’ house, and not very far from the home of the deceased, but for aught that appears, all of these houses and the turpentine camp may have been in another county, or even in another State. The name of the camp is not given, nor does it appear ho-w far or in what direction from Tallahassee the camp or houses mentioned were. Even under the very liberal rules regulating proof of venue prevailing in this State, the evidence is wholly insufficient to-establish the allegation that the mortal wound was inflicted in Leon county.

As to the other matters assigned as error we express no opinion, in view of the reversal of the judgment for the defect in the evidence just considered.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial granted.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lowman v. State, 80 Fla. 18 (Fla. 1920)
    …39, 42 South. Rep. 52; 16 C. J. 769. If the proof of venue does not come within the rule above announced, it will be insufficient. Warrace v. State, 27 Fla. 362, 8 South. Rep. 748; McKinnie v. State, 44 Fla. 143, 32 South. Rep. 786; Smith v. State, 42 Fla. 236, 27 South. Rep. 868; Cook v. State, 20 Fla. 802; Robinson v. State, 20 Fla. 804; Evans v. State, 17 Fla. 192; McCoy v. State, 17 Fla. 193. Venue need not be established beyond a reasonable doubt. If the evidence raises a violent presumption that th…
  • Pennick v. State, 453 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
    …ense occurred two and one-half miles west of Lake City). However, where it cannot be fairly said that the locality referred to in the testimony as the place where the offense occurred is known by or probably familiar to the jury, see Smith v. State, 42 Fla. 236, 27 So. 868 (1900) (witnesses’ testimony that blow which eventually caused victim’s death was struck in an unnamed turpentine camp “very near ‘Clarissa’s house’ ... in sight of Alice Jones’ house, and not very far from the home of the deceased,” ins…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw