EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
LOLA M. HAAS, ET AL., APPELLEES; LOLA M. HAAS, APPELLANT, V. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES; LOLA M. HAAS, APPELLANT, V. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES; EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., APPELLANT, V. LOLA M. HAAS, ET AL., APPELLEES; LOLA M. HAAS, APPELLANT, V. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
LOLA M. HAAS, ET AL., APPELLEES; LOLA M. HAAS, APPELLANT, V. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES; LOLA M. HAAS, APPELLANT, V. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES; EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., APPELLANT, V. LOLA M. HAAS, ET AL., APPELLEES; LOLA M. HAAS, APPELLANT, V. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
489 So. 2d 34
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the jury s award to the broker in this case of $470,000 and the trial court’s addition of prejudgment interest. The record supports the award based on implied contract. Danieli Corporation v. Bryant, 399 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Kerdyk v. Hammock Oaks Estates, Inc., 342 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). We also affirm the trial court’s direction of a verdict in favor of the seller’s agent on the broker’s claim of tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship. West v. Troelstrup, 367 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and GODERICH, MARIO P., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Richard Bertram, Inc. v. Sterling Bank & Tr., 820 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…tionship. (Citations omitted). Here, the agreement, if any, to pay a commission was between Sterling and the brokers. Wald was Sterling’s attorney. He cannot be liable for interfering with his principal’s contract. See Earl A. Hollis, Inc. v. Haas, 489 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (affirming a directed verdict in favor of seller’s agent on broker’s claim of tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship). With respect to the conspiracy count, it is well settled that “neither an agent nor…
-
Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund v. Sand KEY Assocs., Ltd., 509 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 1987)…OVERTON, Justice. This is a petition to review Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Sand Key Associates, Ltd., 489 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (Sand Key II), which is a continuation of a suit to quiet title by Sand Key & Associates previously before this Court. The factual circumstances are set forth in the Second District’s prior decision in Sand Key Associates, Ltd., v…
Authorities Cited
- West v. Troelstrup, 367 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
- Kerdyk v. Hammock Oaks Ests., Inc., 342 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Danieli Corp. v. Bryant, 399 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)