RAYMOND LANDRY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES A. LYNAUGH, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the petitioner's claim regarding improper hypotheticals during voir dire was not novel at the time of his trial, and therefore, his procedural default in failing to object contemporaneously was not excused.
The petitioner sought rehearing on his claim that the prosecutor's use of hypotheticals during voir dire was improper. He argued that his failure to o…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Cause And Prejudice Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
. Reed v. Ross, 468 U.S. 1, 14-15, 104 S.Ct. 2901, 2909-10, 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984).
. 472 U.S. 320, 105 S.Ct. 2633, 86 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985).
. Adams v. Wainwright, 804 F. 2d 1526 (11th Cir.1986), modified on reh’gsub nom. Adams v. Dugger, 816 F. 2d 1493, 1497-1500 (11th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1106, 99 L.Ed.2d 267 (1988).
. Caldwell, 472 U.S. at 341, 105 S.Ct. at 2646.
. Adams, 804 F. 2d at 1528.
. Id., 816 F. 2d at 1499-1500.
. See, e.g., Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 189-95, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2932-35, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976); Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242, 257-58, 96 S.Ct. 2960, 2969, 49 L.Ed.2d 913 (1976); Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 303-04, 96 S.Ct. 2978, 2991, 49 L.Ed.2d 944 (1976); Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262, 272-73, 96 S.Ct. 2950, 2956-57, 49 L.Ed.2d 929 (1976).
. See Lane v. Texas, 743 S.W. 2d 617, 619-29 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (en banc); Gardner v. Texas, 730 S.W. 2d 675, 684-90 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 248, 98 L.Ed.2d 206 (1988). We take judicial notice of the state-court trial records in these cases, each of which discloses that the trial was held before Caldwell.
. See Reed, 468 U.S. at 19-20, 104 S.Ct. at 2912-13; Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107, 131-33, 102 S.Ct. 1558, 1573-74, 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982); Adams, 816 F. 2d at 1499-1500.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1976)
- Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 (U.S. 1982)
- Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (U.S. 1976)
- Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (U.S. 1976)
- Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (U.S. 1976)
- Reed v. Ross, 468 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1984)
- Adams v. Louie Wainwright, 804 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1986)
- Adams v. Dugger, 816 F.2d 1493 (11th Cir. 1987)