SEAWINDS, LTD., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NEDLLOYD LINES, B.V.; ROYAL NEDLLOYD GROUP, N.V.; KNSM LINES, B.V.; AMERICAN PRESIDENT COMPANIES, LTD.; AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. SEA-LAND CORPORATION; SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.; DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET AF 1912 A/S; A/S DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET SVENDBORG; A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK LINE; HAPAG-LLOYD AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT (ICT) B.V., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
SEAWINDS, LTD., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
NEDLLOYD LINES, B.V.; ROYAL NEDLLOYD GROUP, N.V.; KNSM LINES, B.V.; AMERICAN PRESIDENT COMPANIES, LTD.; AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. SEA-LAND CORPORATION; SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.; DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET AF 1912 A/S; A/S DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET SVENDBORG; A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK LINE; HAPAG-LLOYD AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT (ICT) B.V., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
846 F.2d 586
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in its opinion. See Seawinds Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V., 80 B.R. 181 (N.D.Cal.1987).