TIMOTHY DUANE ALTERS AND JOAN SCHMITT ALTERS, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
H.W. HENDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND WATSON REALTY CORPORATION AND BRENDA JOY CAMPBELL, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES
TIMOTHY DUANE ALTERS AND JOAN SCHMITT ALTERS, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
H.W. HENDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND WATSON REALTY CORPORATION AND BRENDA JOY CAMPBELL, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES
489 So. 2d 840
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
BARFIELD, Judge.
The trial court dismissed appellants’ nine-count second amended complaint against Henderson Construction, Watson Realty and Campbell. Eight of those counts fail to state a legal cause of action and violate the pleading rules of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Count I does manage to recite the elements of a breach of contract cause of action. However, that count also violates Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(b). Appellants’ counsel foreclosed his opportunity to further amend this complaint by requesting a dismissal with prejudice, if the court dismissed the complaint.
Accordingly, the order dismissing all counts of the complaint is AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jennings v. State, 453 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1984)…that the remark was so prejudicial that a mistrial was required. Considering the totality of the circumstances, we do not find reversible error. Again, we must caution prosecutors to confine their arguments to the evidence. See Teffeteller v. State, 489 So. 2d 840 (Fla.1983). With regard to appellant’s fifth contention, we reject the assertion that his trial was tainted by the admission of three photographs of the body of the victim. We find that the photographs were properly admitted as relevant to the issu…
-
Mejia v. Egleston (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)…nvert the nonfinal order of dismissal with leave to amend into a final dismissal with prejudice, Mejia waived any right to raise, on appeal, a claim that he should be given a further opportunity to amend. See Alters v. H.W. Henderson Const. Co., 489 So. 2d 840, 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (noting: “Appellants' counsel foreclosed his opportunity to further amend this complaint by requesting a dismissal with prejudice, if the court dismissed the complaint.”) 4 no further than the complaint and its attac…