MCCARTHY & MCCARTHY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, P & L FUNDING CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION; AND MANHATTAN'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A., A BANKING ASSOCIATION ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
MCCARTHY & MCCARTHY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, P & L FUNDING CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION; AND MANHATTAN'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A., A BANKING ASSOCIATION ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
489 So. 2d 1195
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings on the authority of Finkelstein v. Southeast Bank, 490 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). There is a lack of evidence in the record below supporting the entry of an injunction freezing the bank accounts of the appellants because those accounts contain funds allegedly fraudulently secured from the appellee.
HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bruton v. State, 510 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…NIMMONS, Judge. This is another sentencing guidelines case. Appellant appeals from his sentences which upwardly depart from the sentence range called for by the guidelines scoresheet. Previously, this court in Bruton v. State, 489 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), reversed appellant’s sentences and remanded for resentencing because of the [*1244] trial court's failure to state written reasons for departure. Appellant pled guilty to four counts of obtaining property for a worthless check,…
-
Finklea v. State, 514 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…in imposing consecutive sentences when it re-sentenced appellant. See Stokes v. State, 512 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Sparkman v. State, 507 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Foster v. State, 491 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Bruton v. State, 489 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), appeal after remand, 510 So. 2d 1243, (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); and Hagins v. State, 509 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Once again, this court must reverse appellant’s sentence and remand with instructions to the trial court to sent…
Authorities Cited
- Finkelstein v. Se. Bank, N.A., 490 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- Hausbach v. Se. Bank, N.A., 490 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)