WILLIAM WOLLMAN AND LORELLA WOLLMAN, APPELLANTS,
v.
LEROY LEVY, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final summary judgment of foreclosure, see David v. Sun Federal Savings & Loan Association, 461 So. 2d 93 (Fla.1984), but vacate the foreclosure sale of the property. Once a timely motion for rehearing is made, the operation of the judgment is suspended until the motion is disposed of. United American Ins. Co. v. Oak, 123 Fla. 159, 170, 166 So. 547, 551 (1936); see Dade County v. Snyder, 134 Fla. 756, 184 So. 489 (1938); Pruitt v. Brock, 437 So. 2d 768, 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Appellants timely moved for a rehearing; therefore, the sale of the property should not have been carried out until the motion had been acted upon.
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marsh & McLennan, Inc. v. Aerolineas Nacionales del Ecuador, 530 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…Fla. 4th DCA 1966). See also State ex rel. Owens v. Pearson, 156 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1963); Dade County v. Snyder, 134 Fla. 756,184 So. 489 (1938); Johnson v. Feeney, 507 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 518 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1987); Wollman v. Levy, 489 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Francisco v. Victoria Marine Shipping, Inc., 486 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).5-6 Thus, the order of dismissal for lack of prosecution, although nominally final, is actually inchoate,7 and the effect of the order on rehearing r…
-
Hoffman v. Bankunited, N.A., 137 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…entitled to relief and affirm without discussion. On the fourth issue, we agree that the foreclosure sale of the property must be set aside because the sale was conducted while Hoffman’s timely motion for rehearing was pending. See Wollman v. Levy, 489 So. 2d 1239, 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Accordingly, we vacate the foreclosure sale. Because the trial court disposed of the rehearing motion some time after the sale, the court may again order the foreclosure sale of the property on remand. Affirmed in part, v…
-
United Invs. Ltd. P'ship v. Resolution Tr. Corp., 566 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…, Inc., 469 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Mejiah v. Rodriguez, 342 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The trial court also erred in permitting the foreclosure sale to proceed without having ruled upon appellant’s motion for rehearing. Wollman v. Levy, 489 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Accordingly, the partial summary judgment of foreclosure is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to set [*371] aside the foreclosure sale, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Pruitt v. Brock, 437 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- David v. SUN Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 461 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1984)
- United Am. Ins. Co. v. Oak, 123 Fla. 159 (Fla. 1936)
- Dade Cnty. v. Snyder, 134 Fla. 756 (Fla. 1938)