C & G SEALING AND PAVING CONSTRUCTION AND CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
BRUCE HARMON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This concurring opinion reconciles differing case law on uninsured motorist coverage exclusions for family members who own their own vehicles, distinguishing cases based on policy definitions of insureds and limitations of liability coverage.
The author of the concurring opinion believes that differing case outcomes regarding uninsured motorist coverage exclusions for family members can be reconciled by carefully examining the specific policy provisions and definitions of insureds.
The opinion discusses various Florida DCA cases (Auto-Owners v. Bennett, Auto-Owners v. Queen, Dairyland v. Kriz, France v. Liberty Mutual) concerning…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
[*87] PER CURIAM.
Appellants having failed to present this court with a record which indicates that the issues argued were preserved for appellate review, we have no alternative but to affirm the deputy commissioner. AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.