EMILY MALONE D/B/A PRECISION CABINET COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE

Fed. Cir. | 1988-09-26

No. Appeal No. 88-1021

Before RICH, NIES, and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.

857 F.2d 787 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (1988) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

On Page 1445, Section II, of the opinion decided June 16, 1988, the following footnote is inserted at the end of the second sentence:

* The contract at issue contained the Disputes clause set forth in 32 C.F.R. § 7-103.12(a)-(h). Thus, we need not, and do not, decide if a contractor’s failure to perform can be excused by the government’s material breach if the contract contains the Disputes clause set forth in 32 C.F.R. § 7-103.12(b).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Stone Forest Indus., Inc. v. The United States, 973 F.2d 1548 (Fed. Cir. 1992)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

EMILY MALONE D/B/A PRECISION CABINET COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

EMILY MALONE D/B/A PRECISION CABINET COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE