EMILY MALONE D/B/A PRECISION CABINET COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE

Fed. Cir. | 1988-09-26
No. Appeal No. 88-1021
Before RICH, NIES, and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.
857 F.2d 787 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Having considered the Petition for Rehearing, the panel grants that Petition to the extent of ordering the following change in the opinion. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT

On Page 1445, Section II, of the opinion decided June 16, 1988, the following footnote is inserted at the end of the second sentence:

* The contract at issue contained the Disputes clause set forth in 32 C.F.R. § 7-103.12(a)-(h). Thus, we need not, and do not, decide if a contractor’s failure to perform can be excused by the government’s material breach if the contract contains the Disputes clause set forth in 32 C.F.R. § 7-103.12(b).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw