PEOPLE OF BIKINI, ENEWETAK, RONGELAP, UTRIK AND OTHER MARSHALL ISLANDS ATOLLS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the appellants' motion to dismiss their appeal with prejudice.
Appellants moved to dismiss their appeal, docketed as No. 88-1206, based on a new law providing funding for the Resettlement Trust Fund for the People…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dismissal With Prejudice cases and more on FLexlaw
NIES, Circuit Judge.
All appellants in Docket No. 88-1206, which is part of the above captioned consolidated appeal, move this court under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 42(b) to dismiss their appeal docketed as No. 88-1206.
That request is based upon P.L. No. 100-466, signed into law by the President on September 27, 1988. That law provides, in part, for the appropriation of $90 million over a five year period for the purpose of funding the Resettlement Trust Fund for the People of Bikini. That fund was established under P.L. No. 97-257. Payment of the funds is conditioned, in part, on the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of Appeal No. 88-1206, by the People of Bikini.
Upon consideration of the motion, and because there is no opposition to the motion,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
(1) Appeal No. 88-1206 is dismissed with prejudice.
(2) Both parties shall bear their own costs.
(3) Any further fees due to this court in connection with Appeal No. 88-1206 shall be paid by appellants in that appeal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cathelina Antolok v. United States, 873 F.2d 369 (D.C. Cir. 1989)
-
People OF Enewetak v. The United States, 864 F.2d 134 (Fed. Cir. 1988)