ROGER RICKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Plea Colloquy cases and more on FLexlaw
SHIVERS, Judge.
Appellant Ricks originally brought an appeal to this court of the trial court’s denial without hearing of his motion for post-conviction relief. We found the motion to state a legally sufficient ground for relief in that it appeared appellant’s plea may have been based upon a failure of communication or a misunderstanding of the facts. We therefore remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to supplement its order with portions of the record pertinent to the plea and with the colloquy surrounding the court’s acceptance of the plea. Ricks v. State, 478 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). After receiving such supplementation, we agree with the trial court that appellant’s motion was without merit, and affirm the order denying the motion.
WENTWORTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stalley v. Transitional Hosps. Corp. OF Tampa, Inc., 44 So. 3d 627 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…DCA 2007) (holding that a husband could not settle his wife’s claim with law firm as her agent absent evidence that the wife had represented to the law firm that her husband had authority to bind her in settlement negotiations); Schmidt v. Matilsky, 490 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (holding that one spouse cannot transfer property held by spouses as tenants by the entire-ties without evidence that that spouse is acting as the duly appointed agent of the other spouse); Douglass v. Jones, 422 So. 2d 352 (Fla.…
-
Ayers v. Thompson, 536 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…ettled rule in Florida is that neither spouse vested to an estate by the entireties, can alienate or encumber any part of the estate without the consent of the other spouse. Cooper v. Maynard, 156 Fla. 534, 23 So. 2d 734 (1945); Schmidt v. Matilsky, 490 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Parrish v. Swearington, 379 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Murray v. Sullivan, 376 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). However, an exception occurs if in the transaction one spouse, with full knowledge of the other spouse, constitu…
-
Hamlin v. E. Coast Props., Inc., 616 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…ned by the Hamlins. Having carefully considered each of the eight points raised by the Hamlins in their challenge to the final judgment of specific performance, we find no reversible error, and accordingly affirm. See generally, Schmidt v. Matilsky, 490 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). By a ninth point in their brief, appellants challenge an order entered by the trial court on February 27, 1992, which awarded attorney’s fees to RTC. The record is clear that appellants filed their notice of appeal on February…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ricks v. State, 478 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)