UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JULIO PICCINONNA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
JULIO PICCINONNA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
861 F.2d 639
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
(Opinion August 28, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 858 F. 2d 743).
Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stewart v. Baldwin Cnty. Bd. OF Educ., 908 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir. 1990)…diction is properly exercised over nonappealable decisions of the district court when the reviewing court already has jurisdiction over one issue in the case. See Myers v. Gilman Paper Corp., 544 F. 2d 837, 847 (5th Cir.1977); Broughton v. Courtney, 861 F. 2d 639, 641 n. 1 (11th Cir.1988). See also 9 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 110.25 (noting that “once a case is lawfully before a court of appeals, it does not lack power to do what plainly ought to be done”). Pendent jurisdiction over the Eleventh Amendme…
-
Swint v. The City OF Wadley, 5 F.3d 1435 (11th Cir. 1993)…So do we. . See also Akin v. PAFEC Ltd.., 991 F. 2d 1550, 1563-64 (11th Cir.1993); Andrews v. Employees’ Retirement Plan, 938 F. 2d 1245, 1247-48 (11th Cir.1991); Crymes v. DeKalb County, 923 F. 2d 1482, 1485 (11th Cir.1991); Broughton v. Courtney, 861 F. 2d 639, 641 n.1 (11th Cir.1988); Western Electric Co. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 568 F. 2d 1203, 1208 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 895, 99 S.Ct. 255, 58 L.Ed.2d 241 (1978); Myers v. Gilman Paper Corp., 544 F. 2d 837, 847 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed,…
-
Crymes v. Dekalb Cnty., 923 F.2d 1482 (11th Cir. 1991)…rits, whether pendant jurisdiction is appropriate with regard to that issue and the punitive damages issue is within this court's discretion. See Stewart v. Baldwin County Bd. of Educ., 908 F. 2d 1499, 1508-09 (11th Cir.1990); Broughton v. Courtney, 861 F. 2d 639 (11th Cir.1988); Western Electric Co. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 568 F. 2d 1203, 1208 (5th Cir.1978). We decline to exercise our discretion to reach these nonfinal issues.4 WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY REFUSING TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT ON AB…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence