THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
ROBERT K. HAYDEN, RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary proceeding is presently before us on complaints of The Florida Bar and the report of the referee. Neither respondent nor The Florida Bar contests the report. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla.Const. Respondent tendered a guilty plea for a consent judgment admitting his violations of Disciplinary Rules 9-102(A) and 9-102(B)(2). The referee accepted the plea and recommended that respondent be suspended for thirty days beginning August 1, 1986, and pay all costs. We approve the referee’s findings and recommendations.
Accordingly, respondent shall be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days, effective August 1, 1986.
Judgment for costs in the amount of $7,863.86 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, OVER-TON, EHRLICH and BARKETT, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Hayden, 583 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1991)…ngs were again instituted against respondent in 1986 for violations of disciplinary rules relating to the handling of funds and property belonging to clients. Respondent was suspended for thirty days for these violations. See The Fla. Bar v. Hayden, 490 So. 2d 940 (Fla.1986). [*1018] Accordingly, we approve the referee’s report and suspend and enjoin respondent from the practice of law for six months. This suspension is effective thirty days from the date this opinion is filed in order to protect respondent’s…