RAYMOND HANS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s order retaining jurisdiction for review of any Florida Parole and Probation Commission release order pertaining to appellant’s sentence for attempted sexual battery.
Since the trial court has not stated with individual particularity the facts upon which it relied in retaining jurisdiction, as required by section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1983), and Robinson v. State, 458 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), the sentence of April 19, 1985, is modified so as to eliminate the retention of jurisdiction to review any release order of the Parole and Probation Commission.
DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. McKAY, 568 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…ran, 546 So. 2d 24, 25 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (where husband did not object to ex-parte referral to general master “[he] waived any objections he may have had ... by voluntarily participating in the hearing before the general master.”); Cox v. Cox, 490 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court order approving the general master’s report with respect to the attorney’s fee and cost award and remand for the trial court to consider and decide the wife’s motion for attorney’s fees…
-
Josephina Gonzales Palmer v. Palmer, 582 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…the ten-day period for filing exceptions did not end until the end of October 10. Therefore, the trial court erred in entering its order approving the general master’s report on October 10, pri- or to the end of the ten-day period.1 See Cox v. Cox, 490 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Elliott v. Elliott, 478 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Berkheimer v. Berkheimer, 466 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Plevy v. Plevy, 466 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Accordingly, we vacate the order of approval and reman…
-
Moskowitz v. Moskowitz, 611 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…n only after the court hears the exceptions. Therefore, it was error to deny appellant’s motion to vacate the premature order. Berkheimer v. Berkheimer, 466 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Kay v. Kay, 430 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Cox v. Cox, 490 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Elliott v. Elliott, 478 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Dembrowski v. Dembrowski, 580 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We recognize that this issue appears mooted by the trial court’s subsequent denial of appellant’s exceptions…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Robinson v. State, 458 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)