UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT,
v.
UNIT NO. 7 AND NO. 8, ETC., ET AL, APPELLEES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT,
UNIT NO. 7 AND NO. 8, ETC., ET AL, APPELLEES
864 F.2d 1421
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1988)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition for rehearing en bane has been filed; we defer ruling on said petition for rehearing en banc and stay the issuance of mandate deferring further order pending decisions by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Monsanto, 836 F. 2d 74 (2d Cir.1987), rev’d & remanded on other grounds, 852 F. 2d 1400 (2d Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 353, 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988), and United States v. Harvey, 814 F. 2d 905 (4th Cir.1987), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. In Re Caplin & Drysdale, 837 F. 2d 637 (4th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 363, 102 L.Ed.2d 352 (1988).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gomez v. United States, 490 U.S. 858 (U.S. 1989)
-
Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (U.S. 1991)
-
United States v. Bissell, 866 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1989)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- In re Forfeiture Hearing AS TO Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, 837 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1988)
- United States v. Monsanto, 852 F.2d 1400 (2d Cir. 1988)
- United States v. Harvey, 814 F.2d 905 (4th Cir. 1987)
- United States v. Monsanto, 836 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1987)