ALFRED S. BARNHART, III, J. SCOTT BARNHART, JEROME C. BARNHART, AND JENNIFER BARNHART THOMPSON, APPELLANTS,
v.
BETTY P. BARNHART HOVDE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE 1978 BARNHART TRUST AGREEMENT, MAXWELL C. BOALES AND 6. LARRY SIMS, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Subsequent court approval of a trustee's sale is sufficient to cure the failure to obtain prior court authorization, especially when the sale is in the beneficiaries' best interest.
A trustee sold trust property without prior court approval. The trial court found the sale was in the beneficiaries' best interest and would have appr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conflicting Interests cases and more on FLexlaw
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a declaratory relief action. In a trust established by agreement pursuant to a marriage dissolution settlement, appellee Hovde was named the trustee for the beneficiaries, who are her stepchildren. They are also the children of the trustor, and appellants here. The beneficiaries appeal from the judgment which established court approval of the sale of the only asset of the trust, an apartment complex. The purported approval was done after the sale had been consummated. The trustee breached her duties by violating the terms of the trust and section 737.403(2), Florida Statutes (1983), which requires court approval before a sale of the trust asset. Appellee was a trustee who had interests which definitely conflicted with those of her beneficiaries and the sale of the asset resulted in a benefit to her and a detriment to the appellants. The court erred in approving the misconduct of the trustee so we reverse the judgment and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent herewith.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
COWART, J., concurs.
SHARP, J., dissents with opinion.
SHARP, Judge,
dissenting.
I dissent because I do not believe the decision of the trial court was erroneous.
Section 737.403, Florida Statutes (1983) does not contain a provision requiring that a conveyance be rescinded as void merely because a trustee has not obtained prior court approval. It does require the trustee to obtain court authorization. However, where the actions of a trustee are in the best interest of the beneficiaries, subsequent court approval, after review of the trustee’s actions, should be sufficient to cure failure to get prior approval. § 737.-403(2), Fla.Stat. (1983); cf. Mills v. Ball, 380 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Pratt v. Lavender, 319 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).
After a full hearing, the trial judge in this case found that he would have approved the sale of the property, had the trustee requested it before the sale. He also found that the price and terms of the sale were fair and equitable to all parties and should be confirmed. A trial judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and should not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Zinger v. Gattis, 382 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
The record in this case supports his findings. There was evidence to the effect that the net earnings of the apartment complex were very small, and may not have been sufficient to pay the mortgage off and make needed capital improvements. Therefore, there was a possibility that the trust asset could be lost to foreclosure or diminish in value if it were not sold. I would affirm.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pub. Health Tr. OF Dade Cnty. v. The Honorable Francis X. Knuck, 495 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…ly to the extent specified in section 768.28, once the limitations period expires, plaintiff loses the opportunity to provide the omitted requirements. Burkett v. Calhoun County, 441 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Dukanauskas; see Halpin v. Short, 490 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); cf. Wemett v. Duval County, 485 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (dismissal of complaint with prejudice error where plaintiff could comply with § 768.-28(6)(a) within limitations period); Lee v. South Broward Hospital District, 473…
-
Brigham v. Brigham, 11 So. 3d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…tion 737.403(2), which requires a trustee to seek court approval from a court for the exercise of a trust power when it conflicts with the trustee’s individual interest. See Bailey v. Leatherman, 615 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Barnhart v. Hovde, 490 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Consequently, we agree with appellants that Dana’s improper transfer must be set aside and the final judgment reversed so that the proceeds from the sale and interest be returned to the EFP Land Trust and then distributed in ac…
-
Villa Maria Nursing & Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. S. Broward Hosp. Dist., 8 So. 3d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…tatute of limitations for equitable subrogation runs from time subrogee pays claim). At the time of dismissal, the applicable limitations periods had not expired. Therefore, the case should have been dismissed without prejudice. Cf. Halpin v. Short, 490 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (holding that dismissal with prejudice was proper where the limitations period for providing section 768.28(6) notice had expired by the time dismissal was entered). The hospital contends that Pangilinan v. Broward County, 914 So…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Zinger v. Gattis, 382 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Arno Pratt and Ernestine Pratt v. Lavender, 319 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- William B. Mills under the Last Will and Testament and Codicils thereto of Alfred I. duPont v. Ball, 380 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)