UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
NEWBY FRANKLIN LOVE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
NEWBY FRANKLIN LOVE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
867 F.2d 209
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1989)
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Newby Franklin Love has appealed from the denial of his motion to vacate sentence 1 by the District Court of South Carolina. Although the two cases were not consolidated for purposes of appeal, Love’s oral argument was heard in this court at the same time as that of Robert Edward Lee, an original co-defendant, and the assignments of error pressed by Love and Lee are substantially identical.
After taking into consideration the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent authorities, we affirm the denial of Love’s motion for the reasons fully articulated in the opinion filed in the companion case of United States v. Lee, 867 F. 2d 206 (4th Cir.1989).
AFFIRMED.
. 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Nissen, 928 F.2d 690 (5th Cir. 1991)
-
United States v. Medina-Garcia, 918 F.2d 4 (1st Cir. 1990)
-
United States v. Diaz, 936 F.2d 786 (5th Cir. 1991)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. LEE, 867 F.2d 206 (4th Cir. 1989)