GLORIA M. TYLER, APPELLANT,
v.
DONALD L. TYLER, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1986-07-09
No. 85-2467
SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.
490 So. 2d 1355 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1986)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the ex-husband's motion for summary judgment should not have been granted because it violated notice requirements and the ex-wife's appeal of the denial of her summary judgment motion is dismissed.


Facts & Procedural History

An ex-wife appealed an order granting her ex-husband's motion for summary judgment to set aside a property division in a dissolution judgment. The ex-…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
LEHAN, Judge.

LEHAN, Judge.

An ex-wife appeals from the trial court’s order granting the ex-husband’s motion for summary judgment on the wife’s petition to set aside the portion of the Final Judgment of dissolution relating to the division of marital property. We reverse.

The record shows that the motion was filed on the day of the hearing on the motion and, therefore, shows lack of compliance with the notice requirements of rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Although in the form order a box is checked opposite the statement that “notice was given to all interested persons,” it would have been impossible for there to have been the requisite notice under that rule. The husband contends that at the hearing the wife waived that notice requirement. However, there is no record citation given in support of that contention, and there is in the record no transcript of the hearing nor, indeed, any showing that a court reporter was present at the hearing. Also, the box opposite the statement that “notice was waived by all interested persons” was not checked.

The ex-wife further appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment on the same petition. However, a denial of a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory order which is not appealable. See rule 9.130, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See also Vanco Construction, Inc. v. Nucor Corp., 378 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Reversed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw