ANIMAL DEFENSE COUNCIL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
DONALD P. HODEL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS-APPELLEES
ANIMAL DEFENSE COUNCIL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
DONALD P. HODEL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS-APPELLEES
867 F.2d 1244
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
We regret that in the opinion, published at 840 F. 2d 1432, there was an error made on page 1436, in the second column in the first full paragraph. This paragraph should read as follows:
The district court may also inquire outside of the administrative record “when it appears the agency has relied on documents or materials not included in the record.” Public Power Council [v. Johnson], 674 F. 2d at 794 [9th Cir.1982], In addition, discovery may be permitted if supplementation of the record is necessary to explain technical terms or complex subject matter involved in the agency action. Id.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe OF Indians v. United States Dep't OF The Navy, 898 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir. 1990)
-
Blaine P. Thompson v. United States Dep't OF Labor, 885 F.2d 551 (9th Cir. 1989)
-
City OF Mount Clemens v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 917 F.2d 908 (6th Cir. 1990)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Animal Def. Council v. Hodel, 840 F.2d 1432 (9th Cir. 1988)