WILLIAM ALVIN SMITH, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
WALTER ZANT, WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT
WILLIAM ALVIN SMITH, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE,
WALTER ZANT, WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT
873 F.2d 253
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1989)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court
(Opinion August 26, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 855 F. 2d 712)
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of June 5, 1989, on a date hearafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Clarke v. United States, 184 So. 3d 1107 (Fla. 2016)…ce withheld, may nevertheless be held to have been ‘convicted’ for purposes of applying federal criminal statutes which punish certain conduct following conviction of a felony.” Id. at 1527. We affirmed that .holding in United States v. Grinkiewicz, 873 F. 2d 253 (11th Cir.1989) (per curiam). Thus, we.find ourselves facing conflicting commands. On the one hand, our prior-precedent rule demands that we follow out* prior decisions on this matter. See Chubbuck, 252 F. 3d at 1305 n. 7 (“We are not at liberty to…1 / 2
-
United States v. Smith, 918 F.2d 1501 (11th Cir. 1990)…against him, as well as the multiple sentences. Defendant Hicks, however, raises this issue for the first time on appeal. Technically, he has waived his ability to challenge the multiple con- ■ victions on appeal.. E.g., U.S. v. Grinkiewicz, [*1516] 873 F. 2d 253, 255 (11th Cir.1989) (per curiam) (citations omitted). However, he may still challenge the imposition of multiple sentences for convictions at this stage. Id. Although we recognize this difference between the two defendants, we see little reason to…
-
United States v. Elton Royce Winchester, 916 F.2d 601 (11th Cir. 1990)…of a defendant under two or more separate subdivisions of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). It should also be noted that we have previously construed section 922(g) strictly on a question of sentencing under more than one count. In United States v. Grinkiewicz, 873 F. 2d 253 (11th Cir.1989), the defendant, who had previously been convicted of a felony, was convicted and sentenced on six counts of the possession of a firearm, under section 922(g)(1). The six counts of the indictment arose from the possession of six firea…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Smith v. Zant, 855 F.2d 712 (11th Cir. 1988)