CHARLES T. FOSTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

2d Cir. | 1989-04-26

Nos. 704, Docket 88-7924

Before KEARSE and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and SWEET, District Judge.

873 F.2d 633 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1989) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

This case raises precisely the same issue as that decided this day in Feeney v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation, (2d Cir.1989). 873 F. 2d 628. We reverse and remand for the reasons stated in that opinion.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney, 495 U.S. 299 (U.S. 1990)

Authorities Cited

Feeney v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 873 F.2d 628 (2d Cir. 1989)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

CHARLES T. FOSTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

CHARLES T. FOSTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE