IN RE WILLIAM D. KRAEMER, DEBTOR. WILLIAM D. KRAEMER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
GLYNN H. CROOK, CYNTHIA M. CROOK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

11th Cir. | 1989-05-24
No. 88-8839
Before TJOFLAT, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
873 F.2d 1406 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1989) Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons stated in its dispositive order of October 4, 1988. See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988).

AFFIRMED.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Quaif v. Johnson, 4 F.3d 950 (11th Cir. 1993)
    …history of § 523(a)(4). It traces both the statutory changes and the trends in judicial interpretation over the past 150 years. . The sole exception is the Eleventh Circuit's summary affirmance in Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988), aff'd 873 F. 2d 1406 (11th Cir.1989), which presented a different factual scenario (dischargeability of workers’ compensation judgment). . Section 17(a)(4) of the former Bankruptcy Act provided: A discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from all his provable d…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw