A.P., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Donaldson v. State, 722 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 1998)
  …] that the ends of justice would [be] defeated, or the orderly process of the court disturbed”); Delgado, 573 So. 2d at 86 (finding abuse of discretion where motion timely and refusal to reopen deprived jury of significant evidence); State v. Ellis, 491 So. 2d 1296, 1297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (reversing trial court order denying State’s motion to reopen suppression hearing where hearing not technically closed and ends of justice served by admission of crucial evidence previously omitted). In this case Donaldson…
• Delgado v. State, 573 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …, Burk v. State, 497 So. 2d 731, 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), a denial will be reversed where the request is timely made and the jury will be deprived of evidence which might have had significant impact upon the issues to be resolved. See State v. Ellis, 491 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Barry v. Walker, 103 Fla. 533, 137 So. 711, 716 (1931); Steffanos v. State, 80 Fla. 309, 86 So. 204, 205-06 (1920). In Steffanos, the supreme court reversed the defendant’s conviction for unlawful carnal intercourse with a previ…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• State v. Laveroni, 910 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …ry hearing, raised the qualifications of the narcotics dog. Because the state was not on notice that this was an issue until the court raised it, the court should have granted the state’s request to call witnesses to qualify the dog. State v. Ellis, 491 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (reversing trial court order denying state’s motion to reopen suppression hearing); Donaldson v. State, 722 So. 2d 177 (Fla.1998) (citing Ellis). We accordingly reverse, and, because the issue may come up on remand, explain why we…

Authorities Cited

• State v. E.N., 455 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
• E.N. v. State, 484 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 1986)