JAMES H. GROOMS AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN C. GROOMS, DECEASED, AND EDWARD S. GROOMS, APPELLANTS,
v.
ANDREW J. WOOD, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1901-01-01
43 Fla. 50 Florida Supreme Court (1901) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.:

Per Curiam.:

This cause coming on to be heard for final adjudication in its regular order on the docket, and it appearing to the court that the entry -of appeal was made therein on the 30th day of December, 1895, but does not state any time or term on which such .appeal was returnable before this court, and that the citation therein issued was made returnable to the' June term, 1896, of this court, aiid that the appellee has not appeared here in any manner, the appeal is, therefore, fatally defective, and must therefore be dismissed.

Subsequent to the entry of the appeal a writ of error was sued out by the appellants, but as the cause is one in equity, writ of error does not lie therein.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lucina Augusta Finch v. Bonar, 46 Fla. 246 (Fla. 1903)
    …y the law and rules regulating appeals in chancery, and not by writ of error. As no appeal was entered in this case, and the writ of error sued out does not lie, the proceeding must be dismissed, and it will be so ordered. [*248] See Grooms v. Wood, 43 Fla. 50, 29 South. Rep. 445 ; Heebner v. Town of Orange City, 44 Fla. 159, 32 South. Rep. 879. Maxwerr and Cockrerr, JJ., concur. Tayror, C. J., and Shackreeord, J., concur in the opinion. Hocker, J., being disqualified, took no part in its. consideratio…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw