STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM S. GRASSI, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appealed the dismissal of charges against Grassi for violating a statute requiring county commissioner candidates to be residents of their qualifying district. The court affirmed the dismissal, holding that the statute unconstitutionally adds qualifications beyond those established in the Florida Constitution.
The statute is unconstitutional because it impermissibly adds to the qualifications for county commissioner office already set forth in the Florida Constitution. The Constitution requires only that a candidate reside in the district at the time of election, not at the time of qualification.
[1] A statute imposing additional qualifications for a county commissioner beyond those set forth in the Florida Constitution is unconstitutional.
[2] The Florida Constitution requires a candidate for county commissioner to be a resident of the district from which they qualify at the time of election.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[S]tatutes imposing additional qualifications for office are unconstitutional where the basic document of the constitution itself has already undertaken to set forth those requirements.”
Establishes the governing legal principle that statutory qualifications cannot exceed constitutional qualifications for office.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn July 20, 1984, Grassi presented qualifying papers to run for county commissioner in Broward County District #4, but after learning that seat was no…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dismissal Of Charges cases and more on FLexlaw
HERSEY, Chief Judge.
The state appeals the trial court’s dismissal of charges against the appellee. We affirm.
On July 20, 1984, appellee, desiring to run for the office of county commissioner in Broward County, District # 4, presented his qualifying papers to the office of the supervisor of elections. After learning that the county commissioner seat for District #4 was not open, he changed his papers to indicate that he desired to run for District # 3. Appellee was, at the time, a resident of District # 4.
Section 99.032, Florida Statutes (1983), requires that “[a] candidate for the office of county commissioner shall, at the time he qualifies, be a resident of the district from which he qualifies.” (emphasis added). Appellee was charged with violation of this statute and subsequently filed a motion to dismiss. The trial court granted appellee’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the statute is unconstitutional in that it is inconsistent with article VIII, section 1(e), Florida Constitution (1968), which provides:
Commissioners. Except when otherwise provided by county charter, the governing body of each county shall be a board of county commissioners composed of five members serving staggered terms of four years. After each decennial census the board of county commissioners shall divide the county into districts of contiguous territory as nearly equal in population as practicable. One commissioner residing in each district shall be elected by the electors of the county.
(emphasis added).
“[S]tatutes imposing additional qualifications for office are unconstitutional where the basic document of the constitution itself has already undertaken to set forth those requirements.” State ex rel. Askew v. Thomas, 293 So. 2d 40, 42 (Fla.1974); see also Wilson v. Newell, 223 So. 2d 734 (Fla.1969). In the present case, we interpret the constitution as providing only that a candidate for county commission be a resident of his district at the time of election. As noted by the trial court, since the disputed statute goes one step further in requiring residency at an earlier date — the time of qualifying as a candidate — the statute constitutes an impermissible addition to the constitutional qualifications for the office of county commissioner and is therefore unconstitutional.
Accordingly, the trial court’s order dismissing the charges against appellee is
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Grassi, 532 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1988)…EHRLICH, Chief Justice. We have for review the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in State v. Grassi, 492 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), which declared section 99.032, Florida Statutes (1983), unconstitutional under the Florida Constitution. We have jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution, and approve the decision of the district court. On…
Authorities Cited
- Rocamora v. Singleton Shrimp Co., 223 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 1969)
- The State of Fla. ex rel. Reubin O'D. Askew v. Thomas, 293 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1974)