ELIZABETH PAULINE MERRITT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CONFEDERATION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ETC., AND VOLVO NORTH AMERICAN CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

11th Cir. | 1989-08-24
No. 89-7122
Before TJOFLAT, HILL and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.
881 F.2d 1034 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

On appeal, appellant argues that the district court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We disagree. Binding case law in this circuit holds that a plaintiff must exhaust administrative remedies before suing under an ERISA plan policy. Mason v. Continental Group, Inc., 763 F. 2d 1219 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1087, 106 S.Ct. 863, 88 L.Ed.2d 902 (1986). It is undisputed that appellant failed to pursue the appeal procedures outlined in her employee benefits plan. Therefore, the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the appellees due to appellant’s failure to exhaust her administrative remedies.

AFFIRMED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Watts v. Bellsouth Telecomms., Inc., 316 F.3d 1203 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …0); Curry v. Contract Fabricators Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, 891 F. 2d 842, 846-47 (11th Cir.1990), abrogated on other grounds by Murphy v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 247 F. 3d 1313, 1314 (11th Cir.2001); Merritt v. Confederation Life Ins. Co., 881 F. 2d 1034, 1035 (11th Cir.1989); Mason, 763 F. 2d at 1226-27. The facts of those cases, the ones in which we have applied or declined to apply our ERISA exhaustion requirement, necessarily shape the parameters of that requirement. Whatever their opinions say…
  • …, and to actions based on alleged statutory violations. See Mason v. Continental Group, Inc., 763 F. 2d 1219, 1225-27 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1087, 106 S.Ct. 863, 88 L.Ed.2d 902, (1986); accord Merritt v. Confederation Life Ins. Co., 881 F. 2d 1034, 1035 (11th Cir.1989); Kross v. Western Electric Co., 701 F. 2d 1238, 1243-45 (7th Cir.1983). Cf. Zipf v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 799 F. 2d 889, 891-94 (3d Cir.1986) (exhaustion required in breach-of-contract actions, but not in statutory-violatio…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw