UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT,
v.
UNIT NO. 7 AND UNIT NO. 8 OF SHOP IN THE GROVE CONDOMINIUM, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, V. LOTS 1, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 3, BRUSH CREEK VILLAGE, ET AL., APPELLEES; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, V. LOT 1, OF SUNSET HAVEN, ETC., APPELLEE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, V. STANLEY CARTER KISER, APPELLEE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, V. THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 7 AND LOT 8, BLOCK 14, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES; WILLIAM LLOYD HILL, APPELLEE, V. A.L. LOCKHART, ETC., APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT,
UNIT NO. 7 AND UNIT NO. 8 OF SHOP IN THE GROVE CONDOMINIUM, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, V. LOTS 1, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 3, BRUSH CREEK VILLAGE, ET AL., APPELLEES; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, V. LOT 1, OF SUNSET HAVEN, ETC., APPELLEE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, V. STANLEY CARTER KISER, APPELLEE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, V. THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 7 AND LOT 8, BLOCK 14, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES; WILLIAM LLOYD HILL, APPELLEE, V. A.L. LOCKHART, ETC., APPELLANT
883 F.2d 53
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petitions for rehearing with suggestions for rehearing en banc filed by the appellants in the above cases have been considered by the court and are hereby granted. The prior opinions and judgments entered by this court in these appeals are vacated.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, 877 F.2d 698 (8th Cir. 1989)
-
United States v. The S. Half OF LOT 7 & LOT 8, 910 F.2d 488 (8th Cir. 1990)
-
Holloway v. United States, 960 F.2d 1348 (8th Cir. 1992)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence