HOWARD M. ROSENSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
HOWARD M. ROSENSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
884 F.2d 174
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1989)
Caution
Cited by 50 cases
Opinion of the Court
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (24 total)
-
Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1995)
-
United States v. Malin, 908 F.2d 163 (7th Cir. 1990)
-
United States v. Munoz-Fabela, 896 F.2d 908 (5th Cir. 1990)
Previewing 3 of 24 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence