AARON JAMES AUSTIN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Iribar v. Iribar, 510 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …ny at the final hearing as to the reasonableness of the attorney services rendered without first knowing the results which the attorney obtained in the case; these results cannot be known until after the final hearing. See Buckingham, v. Buckingham, 492 So. 2d 858, 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Agudo v. Agudo, 449 So. 2d 909, 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Travieso v. Travieso, 447 So .2d 940, 943-44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), quashed in part, approved in part, 474 So. 2d 1184 (Fla.1985); Novak v. Novak, 429 So. 2d 414, 415 (Fl…
• Hunter v. Hunter, 540 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …lant’s contention that the trial court erred in “terminating” his visitation rights.2,3 Visitation [*238] rights may be modified if there is a substantial change in circumstances and the modification will benefit the child. Buckingham v. Buckingham, 492 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Manuel v. Manuel, 489 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Although termination of visitation rights is disfavored, § 61.13(2)(b)1, Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1986), the trial court has discretion to restrict or deny visitation when necessary…
• Silber v. Cn'R Indus. OF Jacksonville, Inc., 526 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …n some circumstances. See Akins v. Taylor, 314 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). But the trial court’s discretion is not unlimited, for it may allow reopening only “where this can be done without injustice to the other party.” Buckingham v. Buckingham, 492 So. 2d 858, 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); and see cases cited at 55 Fla.Jur.2d, Trial § 47 n. 99. It seems abundantly clear, therefore, that had Cooper already paid the tax and simply neglected to affix the stamps or otherwise offer proof that the tax had been pai…

Authorities Cited

• Dean v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 438 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1983)