UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

HOLLMANN SUAREZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Senmed, Inc. v. Richard-Allan Med. Indus., Inc., 888 F.2d 815 (Fed. Cir. 1989)
  …case, or ignore all the events that occurred before the appeal. Construction of claim scope (claim interpretation), however, is a question of law for decision by the trial judge on motion for JNOV and by this court on appeal. Johnston v. IVAC Corp., 885 F. 2d 1574, 1579 (Fed.Cir.1989); Standard Oil Co. v. American Cyanamid Co., 774 F. 2d 448, 452, 227 USPQ 293, 295-96 (Fed.Cir.1985); Loctite Corp. v. Ultraseal Ltd., 781 F. 2d 861, 866, 228 USPQ 90, 93 (Fed.Cir.1985); Fromson v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc., 720…
• Hormone Research Found., Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 904 F.2d 1558 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
  …nied Gen-entech’s motion for summary judgment that claims 1 and 18 were not infringed, but these claims were held invalid. . Interpreting a term in a claim, as is interpretation of the claim as a whole, is a question of law. Johnston v. IVAC Corp., 885 F. 2d 1574, 1579-80, 12 USPQ2d 1382, 1385-86 (Fed.Cir.1989). . After discussing the dictionary definitions, the first of which was "identical in all essentials or respects,” the court said "[i]n the context of precise scientific applications, ‘corresponding’…
• London v. Carson Pirie Scott & Co., 946 F.2d 1534 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
  …under the doctrine of equivalents. DISCUSSION A grant of summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 is appropriate where no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Johnston v. IVAC Corp., 885 F. 2d 1574, 1576-77, 12 USPQ2d 1382, 1383 (Fed.Cir.1989). Since one principal purpose of summary judgment “is to isolate and dispose of factually unsupported claims or defenses,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 requires that the nonmoving party “designate ‘specific facts show…