UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
JAMES NEAVILL, APPELLANT

8th Cir. | 1989-10-05
No. 87-2692
Before LAY, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG, BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, MAGILL and BEAM, Circuit Judges, en banc.
886 F.2d 220 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 38 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By an order previously entered, the petition for rehearing en banc filed by the United States was granted. Thus, the panel opinion previously filed, United States v. Neavill, 868 F. 2d 1000 (8th Cir.1989), was vacated by operation of law. Now pending before the Court en banc is Neavill’s appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the District Court.

Neavill has filed a motion to dismiss his own appeal. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. This action, of course, leaves in effect the judgment of conviction, which is final and not subject to further review on appeal.

It is so ordered.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (37 total)

Previewing 3 of 37 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw