STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
ALEJANDRO MENDIOLA, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
ALEJANDRO MENDIOLA, RESPONDENT
492 So. 2d 1074
Florida Supreme Court (1986)
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Hearing cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We review Mendiola v. State, 490 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), to answer a certified question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We previously answered the certified question * affirmatively in State v. Cross, 487 So. 2d 1056 (Fla.1986). We approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur. .
*
Mendiola, at 76:
Under the 1983 Amendments to Article I, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution, does the exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation hearings?
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Cross, 487 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 1986)
- Mendiola v. State, 490 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)