GRACE M. KOCH, APPELLANT,

v.

BERKEY FILM PROCESSING, FLORIDA, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Donley v. State, 557 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …ers are sufficient. When a court finds that a probationer has violated his probation, it must enter a formal order setting forth the conditions that it finds were violated. Cornett v. State, 506 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). See also Smith v. State, 492 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). We, accordingly, remand with directions to enter proper probation violation orders. The appellant need not be present for this purpose. We affirm in all other respects. Affirmed, but remanded with instructions. RYDER, A.C.J.…
• Cornett v. State, 506 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
  …uniform commitment to custody, both of which indicate probation violation, suffice as a formal order of revocation of probation. Accordingly, we reverse with directions that the trial judge enter an order of probation violation. See Smith v. State, 492 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). The defendant need not be present for this purpose. With regard to parole eligibility, we acknowledge in this opinion that the defendant is eligible to be considered for parole in view of the fact that his sentence was not imp…
• Gaal v. State, 599 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …ired, none appears in the record. We direct that, on remand, the trial court enter a formal order of revocation of probation indicating the specific condition of probation violated. Cornett v. State, 506 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Smith v. State, 492 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Condition (23) of the Order of Probation orders Gaal to “abide by previously ordered conditions of probation” and essentially restates a verbal condition ordered by the trial court at the revocation hearing. Because Gaal’s exte…

Authorities Cited

• Lizzie M. Johns v. State, 485 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
• City of ST. Petersburg v. Cashman, 71 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1954)