THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE LUIS ROSARIO A/K/A FORTUNATO MERCADO, APPELLEE
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
GEORGE LUIS ROSARIO A/K/A FORTUNATO MERCADO, APPELLEE
492 So. 2d 1100
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
On authority of Miner v. Westlake, 478 So. 2d 1066 (Fla.1985) (convenience to state of trying codefendants together not a sufficient reason in and of itself to extend defendant’s speedy trial and to deny his motion to sever where delay necessary to accommodate codefendant), the order discharging defendant is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sverdahl v. Farmers & Merchs. Sav. Bank, 582 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…ants filed their notice of appeal. The creditor seeks dismissal of the appeal on jurisdictional grounds, citing Machado v. Foreign Trade, Inc., 544 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Appellants respond with our decisions in Coloso Boat Corp. v. Souza, 492 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and Sloban v. McKesson & Robbins Drug Company, 415 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), arguing that these decisions allowed appeals of identical orders. To be sure, neither Coloso nor Sloban raises or considers whether the orders ar…
-
Ruddy v. Ashton, 554 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)…bert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh, 363 So. 2d 613 (Fla.1st DCA 1978), and has been followed by other courts. See, e.g., Wieczoreck v. H & H Builders, Inc., 450 So. 2d 867 (Fla.5th DCA 1984), affirmed 475 So. 2d 227 (1985) and Coloso Boat Corp. v. Souza, 492 So. 2d 1100 (Fla.4th DCA 1986). The trial court should conduct an examination of the judgment creditor or appoint a master to do this for it. Section 56.29(2), Florida Statutes. If the examination of the judgment creditor establishes the judgment creditor’s cl…
-
Feliz Indus., Inc. v. Holmes Lumber Co., 621 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…of the order which directs it to appear for examination in Duval County. Because its Florida residence is in Leon County, the appellant's examination must be conducted in Leon County. See § 56.-29(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Coloso Boat Corp. v. Souza, 492 So. 2d 1100 (4th DCA 1986). The provision of the appealed order which directs the appellant’s examination in Du-val County is therefore reversed, and this cause is remanded. Upon remand, the trial court should order examination of the appellant by a special mas…
Authorities Cited
- Miner v. Westlake, 478 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 1985)