BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION AND COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANIES, PETITIONERS,
v.
JEANNINE D. COULOMBE AND DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the employer (petitioner) lacks standing to appeal the Benefits Review Board's decision because the Board ruled in its favor on the award, and the discussion of the employee's eligibility was dicta.
The employer petitioned for review of a Benefits Review Board decision that affirmed a denial of medical expenses. The Board had reversed an administr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Aggrieved Party cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This case is before us on a petition for review by the employer of a decision of the Benefits Review Board which affirmed a denial of medical expenses. The Board reversed an administrative law judge’s conclusion that the employee was ineligible, but affirmed the decision denying reim bursement because the requirement for filing a report was not met.
Because the Benefit Review Board ruled in petitioner’s favor on the award, its discussion of respondent’s eligibility is pure dicta. Such discussion cannot have any collateral estoppel effect because it is not essential to the judgment. McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. 130, 141, 101 S.Ct. 2224, 2231, 68 L.Ed.2d 724 (1981); Balcom v. Lynn Ladder and Scaffolding Co., Inc., 806 F. 2d 1127 (1st Cir.1986). For this reason, we have previously held that “[a] party cannot appeal a judgment entered in its favor, because it lacks a ‘personal stake in the appeal’ sufficient to support appellate jurisdiction.” Balcom, 806 F. 2d at 1127 (citing Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Roper, 445 U.S. 326, 336, 100 S.Ct. 1166, 1173, 63 L.Ed.2d 427 (1980)). Similarly, petitioner is not “adversely affected or aggrieved by a final order of the Board,” 33 U.S.C. § 921(c), and lacks standing under the statute to have the decision reviewed. Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. Dellaventura, 544 F. 2d 35, 44-45 (2d Cir.1976).
We therefore dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. Costs to respondent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sierra Club v. Marsh, 907 F.2d 210 (1st Cir. 1990)
-
Kale v. Combined Ins. Co. OF Am., 924 F.2d 1161 (1st Cir. 1991)
-
In re Pub. Serv. Co. OF NEW Hampshire, 898 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1990)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Deposit Guar. Nat'l Bank of Jackson v. Roper, 445 U.S. 326 (U.S. 1980)
- Pittston Stevedoring Corp. & the Home Ins. Co. v. Dellaventura, 544 F.2d 35 (2d Cir. 1976)
- McDANIEL v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1981)
- Balcom v. Lynn Ladder & Scaffolding Co., Inc., 806 F.2d 1127 (1st Cir. 1986)