MARC SIMEON KARLAN, APPELLANT,

v.

CHARLOTTE ELLEN KARLAN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jones v. State, 502 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …two homicide convictions for a single death. Houser is controlling in the instant case. See also State v. Gordon, 478 So. 2d 1063 (Fla.1985); Thomas v. State, 380 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 389 So. 2d 1116 (Fla.1980); Dorman v. State, 492 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Vela v. State, 450 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Barber v. State, 413 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Goss v. State, 398 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Muszynski v. State, 392 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). There is no need in…
• State v. Brown, 725 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …Florida courts require that the underlying facts, circumstances and information be sufficient to allow a person of reasonable caution to make the probable cause determination. State v. Cesaretti, 632 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Dorman v. State, 492 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Jackson. The undisputed facts, circumstances and information known to Trooper Campbell (his observations as well as those of three eyewitnesses he interviewed before ordering the blood draw), establish a reasonable basis for hi…
• Gargone v. State, 503 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …s, the test results were clearly inadmissible since “test results are admissible into evidence only upon compliance with the statutory provisions and the administrative rules enacted by its authority.” Bender, 382 So. 2d at 699. See Dorman v. State, 492 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (blood-alcohol test results not admissible for lack of substantial compliance with statutory requirements where trooper’s observation that defendant’s eyes were red insufficient to establish probable cause to take sample); State…

Authorities Cited

• Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
• Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1977)