TERRY LEE HODO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Victim Vulnerability cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals from his conviction for armed robbery in case number CF 85-113 and sentence for multiple counts of armed robbery and attempted armed robbery in case numbers CF 85-113 and CF 85-114. We find no merit to his claims as regard the conviction but remand the cases for resentencing.
The trial judge departed from the presumptive sentence for reasons that are both valid and invalid. While we find that psychological injury to the victim and consideration for the particular vulnerability of the victim are sufficient reasons for departure in this case, see Nathan v. State, 489 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Hadley v. State, 488 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we remand for resentencing. Albritton v. State, 476 So. 2d 158 (Fla.1985), requires this result where the appellate court is not satisfied that the trial judge would have departed on the basis of the valid reasons alone. Therefore the sentence is vacated and remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.
GRIMES, A.C.J., FRANK, J., and PATTERSON, DAVID F., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. Ira Smith, 705 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…ut expressed no opinion as to summer visitation. The trial court erred by adjudicating an issue that was neither presented by the pleadings nor litigated by the parties. See Johnson v. Johnson, 546 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Antonio v. Antonio, 493 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brady v. Jones, 491 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (holding that the mother’s fundamental due process rights were violated where the issue of terminating visitation and telephone contact was neither presented by the pleadings nor…
-
Netherly v. State, 508 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…y least the trial court, consistent with Rule 3.850, should have required the state to respond to his motion. Thus, we reverse the denial of Netherly’s motion and remand to the trial court with directions that it follow Rule 3.850. Huntley v. State, 493 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Reversed and remanded with directions. DANAHY, C.J., and RYDER and FRANK, JJ., concur.…
-
Kippings v. State, 508 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Hodo v. State, 493 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Hadley v. State, 488 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Brown v. State, 483 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).…
Authorities Cited
- City OF Atl. Beach v. Bull, 476 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1985)
- Albritton v. State, 476 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1985)
- Hadley v. State, 488 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
- Nathan v. State, 489 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)