STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
LINDA PETE, ETC., RESPONDENT
[*451] ADKINS, Justice.
We have for review Pete v. State, 478 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), in which the district court held that the trial court had improperly applied the sentencing guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing rather than those in force at the time of the offense. The decision conflicts with our decision of State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla.1985), and we have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.
In Jackson, we held that the trial court may sentence a defendant pursuant to guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing.
Accordingly, the decision of the district court is quashed.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, EHRLICH and BARKETT, JJ., concur. • SHAW, J., dissents with an opinion.
SHAW, Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons set forth by Justice Ehrlich in his dissent to State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla.1985).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Haimowitz, 512 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 1987)…ow the referee’s report and recommendations to be erroneous. Neither side filed a brief in support of its position. Conviction of felony charges can warrant disbarment. The Florida Bar v. Onett, 504 So. 2d 388 (Fla.1987); The Florida Bar v. Adamo, 493 So. 2d 450 (Fla.1986). After studying the referee’s report and recommendations, we agree that Haimowitz should be disbarred. Accordingly, we hereby disbar Harold B. Haimowitz, effective immediately on the filing of this opinion. Judgment for costs in the amoun…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 1985)
- Pete v. State, 478 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)