STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
DONALD LEE ESBENSHADE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A downward guideline departure sentence requires clear written reasons, and a plea bargain alone, without explicit written justification, is insufficient.
Appellee received a sentence below the recommended guidelines range, purportedly based on a plea bargain. The trial court's written reasons for depart…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Reasons For Departure cases and more on FLexlaw
HALL, Judge.
The state appeals the trial court’s downward guideline departure sentence of appellee contending that the lack of written reasons coupled with the invalidity of these purported reasons for such compel remand for resentencing. We agree.
Appellee was initially convicted of lewd and lascivious acts and received a term of probation which he subsequently violated. Following appellee’s sentence for violation of probation, the trial court, pursuant to an apparent plea bargain, sentenced appellee to a five-year concurrent sentence on the second series of offenses. The sentence was less than the recommended guidelines range.
On the bottom of the scoresheet, under reasons for departure, was written: “Judge Ware’s recommendation. No explicit reasons.” This notation referred to the judge who presided over appellee’s hearing for violation of probation. Additionally, the record on appeal contained an unsigned list of reasons for the departure, most of which were facially invalid.
We reverse the sentence as the downward guideline departure based on the plea bargain was not clearly reduced to writing. Although many of the other reasons for departure found in the unsigned, undated list would constitute an equally valid reason for reversal, it is not clear that this list was ever considered. Therefore, we confine our holding to the lack of written reason.
Generally, departure from the sentencing guidelines is warranted when there is a plea bargain which specifies the permissible sentence. Bell v. State, 453 So. 2d 478 (Fla.2d DCA 1984), Johnson v. State, 458 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). However, in the instant case this otherwise valid reason was not clearly reduced to writing as required by State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla.1985).
We remand for resentencing consistent with this requirement.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 1985)
- Bell v. State, 453 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- City OF Plantation & Mich. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Roberts, 458 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)