GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, APPELLEE,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL NUMBER 84, DEFENDANT/COUNTER-CLAIMANT, APPELLANT

Citator

Cited By (92 total)

• Diaz v. United States, 930 F.2d 832 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” A de novo review, thus, requires independent consideration of factual issues based on the record. Jeffrey S. by Ernest S. v. State Board of Educ., 896 F. 2d 507, 513 (11th Cir.1990). The district judge, in fully adopting the report of the magistrate, stated that he had considered “the motion, the report and recommendation, the objections, and the relevant case law, statutes and federal rules.” Appellant ar…
• In re Davis v. Farmers Home Administration, 899 F.2d 1136 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …dings and recommendations. The Supreme Court upheld § 636(b)(1) against Article III challenge in United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 681-84, 100 S.Ct. 2406, 2415-17, 65 L.Ed.2d 424 (1980). See also Jeffrey S. v. Georgia State Board of Education, 896 F. 2d 507, 512 (11th Cir.1990) (de novo review by Article III court essential to constitutionality of § 636(b)(1)). . While it might seem odd that FmHA, having raised the jurisdictional argument, would then contend that the proceedings below were nevertheles…
• United States v. Williamson, 339 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …d before us does not establish with ‘unmistakable clarity’ that the trial judge reliably determined the voluntariness of the confession. Jackson v. Denno has not been satisfied.” See also Jeffrey S. v. State Board of Education of State of Georgia, 896 F. 2d 507, 513 (11th Cir.1990) (criticizing failure to conduct the requisite de novo review where the district court "relied heavily upon the magistrate's assessment of the evidence and his judgment in drawing reasonable inferences therefrom.”); Stokes v. Sin…