OHIO POWER COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT, OHIO MUNICIPALS, INTERVENORS

D.C. Cir. | 1989-10-12
No. 88-1293
Before MIKVA, SILBERMAN and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges., Before WALD, Chief Judge, and MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
897 F.2d 540 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Topics
Regulatory Jurisdiction Rehearing En Banc Statutory Interpretation

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Regulatory Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the Petitions For Rehearing of Respondent Federal Energy-Regulatory Commission and Intervenor Ohio Municipals, it is

ORDERED, by the Court, that the petitions are denied.

Circuit Judge MIKVA would grant the petitions for rehearing. His statement is attached.

Other
MIKVA, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The Suggestions For Rehearing En Banc of Intervenor Ohio Municipals and of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission have been circulated to the full Court. No member of the Court requested the taking of a vote thereon. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the aforesaid suggestions are denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw