CLAUDE BENLINE, BENLINE PROCESS COLOR COMPANY, INC., DELAND LEASING, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF DELAND, RUSSELL T. MORRIS, PETER J. BURBINE, INDIVIDUALLY, PETER J. BURBINE, IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR THE CITY OF DELAND, JOHN WRIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY, JOHN WRIGHT, IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS FIRE CHIEF OF CITY OF DELAND, THERON CLIFTON, INDIVIDUALLY, THERON CLIFTON, IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS FIRE OFFICIAL FOR THE CITY OF DELAND, D. SCOTT ROHLFS, INDIVIDUALLY, D. SCOTT ROHLFS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF DELAND, LARRY W. LITTLEFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY, LARRY W. LITTLEFIELD, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF DELAND, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
CLAUDE BENLINE, BENLINE PROCESS COLOR COMPANY, INC., DELAND LEASING, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
CITY OF DELAND, RUSSELL T. MORRIS, PETER J. BURBINE, INDIVIDUALLY, PETER J. BURBINE, IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR THE CITY OF DELAND, JOHN WRIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY, JOHN WRIGHT, IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS FIRE CHIEF OF CITY OF DELAND, THERON CLIFTON, INDIVIDUALLY, THERON CLIFTON, IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS FIRE OFFICIAL FOR THE CITY OF DELAND, D. SCOTT ROHLFS, INDIVIDUALLY, D. SCOTT ROHLFS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF DELAND, LARRY W. LITTLEFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY, LARRY W. LITTLEFIELD, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF DELAND, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
897 F.2d 1127
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The judgment is AFFIRMED based upon and for the reasons set forth in the Order of the district court entered in this matter on April 27, 1989 and published at 731 F.Supp. 464.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Puff 'N Stuff of Winter Park, Inc. v. Fed. Tr. Bank, 945 F. Supp. 1523 (M.D. Fla. 1996)…some remedies sought in the instant cáse are different from those sought in state court does not impede the operation of claim preclusion presently. See generally Benline v. City of Deland, 731 F.Supp. 464, 466-68 (M.D.Fla.1989), aff’d, 897 F.2d 1127 (11th Cir,1990) (citations omitted); see also Martinez v. California, 444 U.S. 277, 283, 100 S.Ct. 553, 558, 62 L.Ed.2d 481 (1980). Regardless, the court finds that the slight differences in the respective prayers for relief are made even more…
Authorities Cited
- Benline v. City of Deland, 731 F. Supp. 464 (M.D. Fla. 1989)