JANICE BYRD, APPELLANT,
v.
CASSANDRA A. PYLE, EXECUTRIX, ET AL.
JANICE BYRD, APPELLANT,
CASSANDRA A. PYLE, EXECUTRIX, ET AL.
902 F.2d 962
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to vacate and to remand the case to the District Court, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and this case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to vacate the judgment and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. See U.S. v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk transmit a certified copy of this order to the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Whitman v. Am. Trucking Ass'ns, Inc., 531 U.S. 457 (U.S. 2001)
-
Am. Mining Cong. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 907 F.2d 1179 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
-
Cent. Ariz. Water Conservation Dist. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 990 F.2d 1531 (9th Cir. 1993)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1950)